The third theme that I would like to pick out from my study of the opening chapters of Genesis is that of work. Specifically, I feel that there are two key principles that can be drawn out for further analysis. The first is work itself and the second is the opposite of work (i.e. not working, or resting).
I want to start by noting that work is part of creation. In designing and manufacturing the universe, God worked. He also gave Adam work to do (Gen 2:15, 19-20). If work is part of creation, and everything God created is good, then work must be good. This is at odds with how work is treated in conventional economic theory. Work is assumed to be a “dis-benefit”, or an opportunity cost. It is a sacrifice of time and effort that people choose to make in order to reap a benefit (e.g. wages or having something to sell). But of course we now live in a fallen world and work, along with everything else in creation, has become corrupted. One of the primary consequences of the fall was that work became tough (3:17-19, 5:29). If God wants to redeem “all things” through Christ (Colossians 1:19-20), then work is one of those things.
If we are all created to work, then in an ideal world nobody should be out of work. As someone who has been unemployed in the past, I know how frustrating and depressing that can be. Aside from the financial pressures, I struggled with the perception that the world was carrying on without me and I wasn’t making a contribution and fulfilling my potential. However, I realised that even though I didn’t have paid work, there was still work for me to do, including the work of looking for work (a full-time job in itself sometimes), voluntary work and domestic duties / home improvements etc. God designed everyone to be productive and therefore I find myself in the surprising position of generally agreeing with Ian Duncan Smith rather than the Archbishop of Canterbury!
So what about rest? It is evident from Genesis that God cares as much about rest as he does about work, if not more so. On the seventh day, God rested (Gen 2:2-3) and, from that point on, he set in motion a weekly cycle of work and rest. Observation of the Sabbath was enshrined in law many centuries later in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:8-11) and is repeated many times in the books of the law. The consequences of disobeying this particular law were severe (Numbers 15:32-36).
So how should we apply the Sabbath law today? Firstly, we should recognise that, while it is good to work, it is also good to rest on a regular basis and the ideal pattern is to refrain from work one day in seven. Just like work, rest is also for everyone. To a certain extent, employees in the EU are protected from working long weeks (but there are opt-out clauses). However, when you factor in self-employment, commuting, unpaid and unofficial overtime, domestic duties, caring responsibilities, studying and voluntary work, many of us in reality work very long hours and probably don’t get at least one day “off” per week.
When I was studying for my Masters, I took work-rest rhythm very seriously. Even at the very start of term when exams seemed like a lifetime away, I disciplined myself to get up early and spend all day reading in the empty library. I would then take evenings and weekends off to relax and spend time with my then fiancĂ©e. I increased my “working hours” only slightly in the run-up to exams and certainly didn’t join my classmates in doing “all-nighters” in the very full library! I performed much better in my Masters than I did in my Bachelors degree some years earlier, where my work-rest rhythm was much more chaotic, reactive and undisciplined.
While the benefits of a work-rest rhythm are clear to see, it sometimes requires a bit of faith. We need to trust God to provide for our needs and honour our decision to work and rest in accordance with his principles, rather than to take matters into our own hands and put in those long hours. However, let’s be realistic and remember that there are many people in the world today whose hourly remittance is pitiful and have to work very long hours just to make ends meet. They can and should still have faith in God’s provision but that provision doesn’t usually consist of “manna from heaven”. It is up to us, as fellow citizens, to use our political and market power to ensure that every person made in the image of God can experience a healthy and fulfilling work-rest rhythm.
This leads me on to my final point. It seems to me that the Sabbath law goes one step further than to say that each of us should take off one day in seven. Not only should everybody take rest days but those rest days should occur on the same day. You can see how this might have worked in the agrarian economy of the Old Testament but is such an ordinance realistic in the modern economy?
Last Sunday, I went to Argos to buy a TV. The shop was very busy and so were the staff. It occurred to me that these workers were certainly not enjoying a Sabbath (and perhaps I wasn’t either). But did that matter? Perhaps they were happy to work unsocial hours for an increased hourly rate and a day off in lieu during the week.
As an office worker, I very rarely have to work on Sundays (or Saturdays) but my consumer demand is such that other people must work on a Sunday to service my needs (e.g. transport workers, hotel and catering staff, shop workers, clergy, media workers, health professionals etc.). Am I then forcing these people to disobey one of the Ten Commandments? Jesus made it clear that we should continue to do good on the Sabbath (Luke 14:1-6) so it stands to reason that someone who needs urgent (or even non-urgent) medical treatment should not be turned away because the hospital is closed on the Sabbath. But is there other work that could and should be done on one of the other six days of the week to allow the job-holder to join the community Sabbath?
From an economics point of view, an enforced community Sabbath is inefficient (if somebody wants to sell something on a Sunday and another person wants to buy it, they will both be better off if we allow them to trade). But does this efficiency come at a price? There is clearly a trade-off between economic value and social value. Does God not only want us to rest but to rest together? Discuss.
Welcome to our blog. We are a group of people passionate about seeing God's kingdom come in all its fullness here on earth. We want to partner with God in this process and to imagine what every sphere of society could look like if renewed and reconceived to reflect the image of our maker. To this end we affirm the revelation and authority of the Bible and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit as breathed through history and available to us now. Our aim for this blog is to be a space to dream big, to think radically, to challenge orthodoxy, and to do it together.
We've named this collective endeavour Metanoia. It is derived from the Greek words meta, meaning change or beyond, and noos, meaning mind. It conveys a dual aim; to effect a change of mind regarding our world and our society; and to invite the One who is able to do exceedingly, abundantly more than we could ask or think, to take us beyond the limits of our human wisdom, towards His kingdom.
We invite you to join us.
We've named this collective endeavour Metanoia. It is derived from the Greek words meta, meaning change or beyond, and noos, meaning mind. It conveys a dual aim; to effect a change of mind regarding our world and our society; and to invite the One who is able to do exceedingly, abundantly more than we could ask or think, to take us beyond the limits of our human wisdom, towards His kingdom.
We invite you to join us.
Monday, 15 November 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Andy,
ReplyDeleteInteresting that you should pick up on the Archbishop's criticisms of the Tory proposals. I too was musing over this when I heard it on the radio.
I agree that scripture clearly shows work to be a positive thing and I can see your logic in concluding that 'purposeful activity' (as St Toms have been defining work), even when unpaid, would therefore seem better than no activity. Whilst I acknowledge that there are forms of work which do not command a salary (housewife/househusband being the most immediately obvious), I wonder whether the idea that 'the worker is worth his wage' (luke 10v7) and the command 'do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain' (deut 25v4) might lead us to a different conclusion about sending the unemployed out to do voluntary work?
Not really sure on this, be interested to hear your thoughts.
Challenging stuff Andy, since I'm certainly fond of many services that are available to me on a Sunday - cafes, the newspaper, church even.
ReplyDeleteWhen you ask is it important not just to rest, but to do so together, the question that comes to mind is 'with whom?'; how do we interpret the command to rest on the seventh day communally? Perhaps a nation or even the world would benefit from such a shared rhythm, but such is the premium put on flexibility of labour that we're unlikely to see that imposed from the top down.
So is it important for us now to take more proactive steps to share our rest with those around us (our families, communities, neighbourhoods) and to explore what the benefits of such shared rest may be? After all, Jesus reminded us that the Sabbath was made for us, so we can expect it to be beneficial. Also, a shared Sabbath could even start to change demand levels for the services that we enjoy - potentially impacting behaviour from the bottom up.
I'm certainly challenged to take sabbath rest more seriously, more consciously thinking about what we corporately (as a family group at least) do and refrain from doing in order to actively rest.
Any ideas on how to do this? Experiences?
Stephen, let me respond to your comment first.
ReplyDeleteHaving reflected on this, it is useful to start by thinking of work and wages as being separate. I would assert that there is always work to do. It is always possible to get up in the morning and expend time and effort (labour inputs) to produce something of value (outputs), whether this be cleaning the house, helping a neighbour, learning a new skill or writing a novel. The problem is that it is not always possible to get paid adequately, or at all, to make it worth one's while undertaking much of this work.
But if one's living costs are being met separately, such as through the benefits system, then I think there are many advantages to encouraging, or coercing, people to do some unpaid productive activity during "working hours".
I think the Archbishop's concerns are more about the psychosocial impacts of such coercion. Forcing disadvantaged people to do menial work is seen as degrading, but this is only because society has decided that some occupations have higher status than others, and that salary is a good indicator for this status.
Just as Jesus washed his disciples' feet, we need to demonstrate that all work is dignified and God-given (perhaps by joining with groups of unemployed people in their community work). In my view, the ideal world is where people work for the joy of working and producing something of value, and where the fruits of that labour are distributed fairly among the workers. How that works in practice will be something I will come on to another time when looking at the Mosaic law.
Nathan, in response to your comment, I will defer to the wisdom of Roy Wood, but changing one word: "I wish it could be Christmas every week!"
ReplyDeleteIf there were any day in the year that feels like a true Sabbath, it would have to be Christmas day. Generally, only essential services remain operational on this day. We don't expect to go shopping, use public transport or access leisure facilities on this day, although the pubs and catering trades and TV and radio channels are kept busy. And yet, despite our restricted freedoms as consumers, it is arguably the best day of the year - well Roy Wood thinks so anyway!
So could we think about what makes Christmas day so good and model Sundays as a mini-Christmas day every week?
In response to the sunday/christmas day thread:
ReplyDeleteDid you know that the Christian thinktank, Jubilee Centre (linked to in the side bar) founded the 'Keep Sunday Special' campaign which in turn defeated the deregulation of Sunday trading in 1985; Margaret Thatcher's first and only defeat in the Commons!
This may be a bit out of context with the direction of the discussion, but I thought I would add some anthropological input. In general, I think economic anthropology is a field with which few students of traditional economics are familiar.
ReplyDeleteOne book I remember from my previous studies is Marshall Sahlins' 'The Original Affluent Society' - here is a link to an excerpt:
http://www.eco-action.org/dt/affluent.html
His main point is that hunter-gatherers often work to suffice their needs rather than meet unlimited wants. In this regard, the problem of elongated working hours is a culture-specific issue related to the institutionalisation of scarcity.
Perhaps before looking to God for new perspectives on the impacts of consumerism, we can first look to other cultures?