We've named this collective endeavour Metanoia. It is derived from the Greek words meta, meaning change or beyond, and noos, meaning mind. It conveys a dual aim; to effect a change of mind regarding our world and our society; and to invite the One who is able to do exceedingly, abundantly more than we could ask or think, to take us beyond the limits of our human wisdom, towards His kingdom.
We invite you to join us.
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Halloween versus Guy Fawkes Night
Thursday, 3 February 2011
PM: A tentative exercise in application
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
Postmodernism is... continued
Thursday, 13 January 2011
Postmodernism is...
1. PM is antifoundational - it denies any privileged unassailable starting point for the establishment of truth.
2. PM is antitotalising - it is critical of theories that seek to explain the totality of reality.
3. PM is demystifying - it strives to show that ideals are characteristically grounded in ideology, economics, or political self-interest.
4. PM does not attempt to overcome modernity (which would be a distinctly modern aim - linear progress). Rather, PM offers the opportunity to live and think in non-modern ways within the continuing cultural dominion of modernity.
As someone who self-consciously advocates a postmodern posture, I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts and discussing how such attributes might transform us.
Friday, 12 November 2010
Response to the comment 'Aren't we already postmodern?'
This is a response to Stephen’s comment. I intended it to be another comment, but it got too long!...
Thursday, 11 November 2010
Postmodernity and Christianity
This post introduces a new topic for discussion – Postmodernity and Christianity. I have tried to explain why I believe that engaging with a critique of our culture (whether late-modern or post-modern – or any other label you want to give it) is essential to gaining an understanding of our own views of the world as it is, and how it could be. I’m aware that it is a Herculean (perhaps Sisyphusian) labour to try to meaningfully think and write about a topic that is so nebulous, contentious and in flux. Also I know that even the vocabulary of post-modernism is (mis)heard very differently, particularly within the church – understood at once as something of a dirty word, and/or a shortcut for being ‘relevant’. Despite these pitfalls, I think the importance of informed, open discourse on this subject outweighs the dangers.
So below is a brief intro (as brief as I can manage) to situate this topic, and kick off some debate. If you’re up for wrestling this through, I look forward to your thoughts: