We've named this collective endeavour Metanoia. It is derived from the Greek words meta, meaning change or beyond, and noos, meaning mind. It conveys a dual aim; to effect a change of mind regarding our world and our society; and to invite the One who is able to do exceedingly, abundantly more than we could ask or think, to take us beyond the limits of our human wisdom, towards His kingdom.
We invite you to join us.
Tuesday, 30 November 2010
Development... sustainable??
Monday, 15 November 2010
What Genesis has to say about Work
Saturday, 13 November 2010
And he shall reign... Hallelujah!
Friday, 12 November 2010
Response to the comment 'Aren't we already postmodern?'
This is a response to Stephen’s comment. I intended it to be another comment, but it got too long!...
Thursday, 11 November 2010
Postmodernity and Christianity
This post introduces a new topic for discussion – Postmodernity and Christianity. I have tried to explain why I believe that engaging with a critique of our culture (whether late-modern or post-modern – or any other label you want to give it) is essential to gaining an understanding of our own views of the world as it is, and how it could be. I’m aware that it is a Herculean (perhaps Sisyphusian) labour to try to meaningfully think and write about a topic that is so nebulous, contentious and in flux. Also I know that even the vocabulary of post-modernism is (mis)heard very differently, particularly within the church – understood at once as something of a dirty word, and/or a shortcut for being ‘relevant’. Despite these pitfalls, I think the importance of informed, open discourse on this subject outweighs the dangers.
So below is a brief intro (as brief as I can manage) to situate this topic, and kick off some debate. If you’re up for wrestling this through, I look forward to your thoughts:
Thursday, 4 November 2010
What Genesis has to say about Value
As recorded in Genesis 1, God built an evaluation programme into his work of creation. He conducted a final evaluation at close of play on Day 6 (1:31) and interim evaluations on Day 1 (1:4), at lunchtime and close of play on Day 3 (1:10,12), close of play on Days 4 and 5 (1:18,21) and lunchtime on Day 6 (1:25). So what was the conclusion of his evaluation studies? At all the interim stages, he assessed his work as being “good” while at the final stage this assessment appears to have increased to “very good”. But what do these terms really mean? Perhaps a social researcher approached him with a clipboard and asked, “Excuse me, sir, could you spare five minutes to answer this short questionnaire? How would you rate your creation (so far)? Very good, good, satisfactory, poor or very poor? Thank you for your time.”
Thursday, 28 October 2010
Define Your Terms - Part 1
Friday, 22 October 2010
Sustainable Community Development - the beginning
Monday, 18 October 2010
Insights on the financial crisis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSDGDerFst4
They are from a lecture by Prof David Harvey from City University New York which summarises his new book 'The Enigma of Capital'. The book and lecture seek to explain the structural causes of the recent financial crisis and as such they are the clearest and most eloquent attempt I've come across. Prof Harvey applies a distinctly Marxian analysis to this topic and unlocks a lot of really serious structural questions that I think need to be confronted if we are serious about reimaging the economy in the image of God.
Check it out. Measure it against the plumb-line. I'll post about a couple of specifics shortly and will try to refrain from shouting viva la Revolution since I'm in the library!
Nathan
Sunday, 17 October 2010
At the city gate...
The conference was great and I'll try and put together a summary of the key points at some stage soon. But first I want to take this opportunity, as we're just setting out on this venture, to introduce Landa Cope and acknowledge the significance of her teaching on my understanding of the importance and relevance of the bible to the whole of society.
Thursday, 14 October 2010
What Genesis has to say about Property
If God created the universe, then either he is the current holder of its property rights or, at some point in history, those rights were transferred to somebody else. I think that the weight of biblical evidence (e.g. Deut 8:17-18, Psalm 24:1) points to the former hypothesis. Therefore it follows that nobody else owns anything.
Does this mean that God disapproves of private property? On the contrary, a large part of the law of Moses is concerned with establishing and protecting property rights. If God disapproved of property, at least two of the Ten Commandments (“Do not steal” and “Do not covet”) would be redundant. This is because God’s law is pragmatic, and designed for a fallen world. A system of property rights is an effective way of managing scarce resources. But this is a discussion for another time, so let’s get back to the more idealistic world of Genesis.
Reflections from Genesis
If we’re honest, the account of creation in Genesis can sometimes read a bit like a fairy story. The debate about how God created the universe and the extent to which the Genesis story can be taken literally is an important one. However, I don’t want to dwell on this here but rather draw out some of the fundamental principles that will help inform our worldview and hence the way we should live our lives.
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
Why Metanoia?
To discover God’s economy, I am starting with the Bible – Old and New Testaments. Within the next year or so, I am aiming to read the entire Bible, marking with a coloured pencil every reference that, in my view, pertains to the world of economics. So far, I have covered the first five books of the Old Testament plus Job.